Friday, March 23, 2012

Installing a local instance of SQL on a Cluster Node

Hi
I have an Active/Passive SQL 2000 Cluster - the OS is W3K Server.
I would like to install a local copy of SQL Server on the node that is
currently passive - if I start the SQL install process, it does give me
this option but I don't know what, if any, problems this might cause.
I appreciate if the currently active node fails, it will failover to
the node which also has a local version running as well.
Has anyone done this? I've tried searching groups and Microsoft without
success.
Thanks
Toby
It's OK to install local instances on cluster nodes. Just make sure the
instance name does not conflict with any instance on the cluster.
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
..
<tjbeaumont@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160036955.164570.322690@.i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
Hi
I have an Active/Passive SQL 2000 Cluster - the OS is W3K Server.
I would like to install a local copy of SQL Server on the node that is
currently passive - if I start the SQL install process, it does give me
this option but I don't know what, if any, problems this might cause.
I appreciate if the currently active node fails, it will failover to
the node which also has a local version running as well.
Has anyone done this? I've tried searching groups and Microsoft without
success.
Thanks
Toby
|||<tjbeaumont@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160036955.164570.322690@.i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
> Hi
> I have an Active/Passive SQL 2000 Cluster - the OS is W3K Server.
> I would like to install a local copy of SQL Server on the node that is
> currently passive - if I start the SQL install process, it does give me
> this option but I don't know what, if any, problems this might cause.
Yes, you can do it, but it is a violation of the HA spirit. Meaning, why in
the world would you want to screw around and do that when the company has
obviously felt that the other SQL instances (in the cluster) require HA?
Don't mess with the HA environment!
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp
|||That's true for production clusters. But we install standalone SQL instances
on a clustered node all the time on our test clusters.
Linchi
"Russ Kaufmann" wrote:

> <tjbeaumont@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1160036955.164570.322690@.i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
> Yes, you can do it, but it is a violation of the HA spirit. Meaning, why in
> the world would you want to screw around and do that when the company has
> obviously felt that the other SQL instances (in the cluster) require HA?
> Don't mess with the HA environment!
>
> --
> Russ Kaufmann
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
> Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
> Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp
>
>
|||"Linchi Shea" <LinchiShea@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6B70403B-35CF-4773-9160-8FFC9DDC8638@.microsoft.com...
> That's true for production clusters. But we install standalone SQL
> instances
> on a clustered node all the time on our test clusters.
So, your test environment doesn't mirror production?
Actually, I can see doing that.
Russ Kaufmann
MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp

No comments:

Post a Comment