Greetings.
I just installed MSDE 2000A
How can I install northwind database on it ?
I looked up on the net and it asks you to install vs2003 version of MSDE
So do I have to del this and install the other MSDE ?
Coz I did run the ConfigSamples.exe from my VS 2003 sdk directory, but it
did not install northwind database for me.
Thanks
Hemang
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
should help.
HTH,
Greg Low [MVP]
MSDE Manager SQL Tools
www.whitebearconsulting.com
"Hemang Shah" <hemang@.hemang.net> wrote in message
news:CfGdnTTggswyXX_cRVn-qg@.rogers.com...
> Greetings.
> I just installed MSDE 2000A
> How can I install northwind database on it ?
> I looked up on the net and it asks you to install vs2003 version of MSDE
> So do I have to del this and install the other MSDE ?
> Coz I did run the ConfigSamples.exe from my VS 2003 sdk directory, but it
> did not install northwind database for me.
> Thanks
> Hemang
>
Showing posts with label installing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label installing. Show all posts
Friday, March 30, 2012
Installing new performance dashboard for SQL Server 2005 SP2
Hi All,
I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
Thanks
Peter
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
or you do not have permission.
Did you run the sql script that came with the download?
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>
|||
> GUEST wrote:
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not
exist
> or you do not have permission.
I am getting the same error.
What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
|||On May 22, 6:54 pm, stacey.do...@.shawinc-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(sdoran) wrote:
> exist
> I am getting the same error.
> What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
Same error here - SQL 2005 SP2 Latest hotfixes, etc. Any fix for
this?
I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
Thanks
Peter
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
or you do not have permission.
Did you run the sql script that came with the download?
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegr oups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>
|||
> GUEST wrote:
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not
exist
> or you do not have permission.
I am getting the same error.
What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
|||On May 22, 6:54 pm, stacey.do...@.shawinc-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(sdoran) wrote:
> exist
> I am getting the same error.
> What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
Same error here - SQL 2005 SP2 Latest hotfixes, etc. Any fix for
this?
Installing new performance dashboard for SQL Server 2005 SP2
Hi All,
I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
Thanks
Peter
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
or you do not have permission.Did you run the sql script that came with the download?
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||The fact that you get an error about 'object_schema_name' suggests SP2 is
not installed on the instance since this is a new function added by SP2. Try
(re)applying SP2 to the instance to see if that resolves the issue.
HTH,
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/sqldbatips
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||
> GUEST wrote:
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not
exist
> or you do not have permission.
I am getting the same error.
What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?|||On May 22, 6:54 pm, stacey.do...@.shawinc-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(sdoran) wrote:
>
> exist
> I am getting the same error.
> What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
Same error here - SQL 2005 SP2 Latest hotfixes, etc. Any fix for
this?sql
I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
Thanks
Peter
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
or you do not have permission.Did you run the sql script that came with the download?
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||The fact that you get an error about 'object_schema_name' suggests SP2 is
not installed on the instance since this is a new function added by SP2. Try
(re)applying SP2 to the instance to see if that resolves the issue.
HTH,
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/sqldbatips
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||
> GUEST wrote:
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not
exist
> or you do not have permission.
I am getting the same error.
What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?|||On May 22, 6:54 pm, stacey.do...@.shawinc-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(sdoran) wrote:
>
> exist
> I am getting the same error.
> What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
Same error here - SQL 2005 SP2 Latest hotfixes, etc. Any fix for
this?sql
Installing new performance dashboard for SQL Server 2005 SP2
Hi All,
I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
Thanks
Peter
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
or you do not have permission.Did you run the sql script that came with the download?
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||The fact that you get an error about 'object_schema_name' suggests SP2 is
not installed on the instance since this is a new function added by SP2. Try
(re)applying SP2 to the instance to see if that resolves the issue.
--
HTH,
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/sqldbatips
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||> GUEST wrote
> Hi All
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 o
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages
>
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new..
>
> Thank
>
> Pete
>
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 2
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 4
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does no
exis
> or you do not have permission
I am getting the same error
What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2|||On May 22, 6:54 pm, stacey.do...@.shawinc-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(sdoran) wrote:
> > GUEST wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> > windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> >
> > Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedureusp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> > 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> > Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedureusp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> > Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> > Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> > Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not
> exist
> > or you do not have permission.
> I am getting the same error.
> What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
Same error here - SQL 2005 SP2 Latest hotfixes, etc. Any fix for
this?
I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
Thanks
Peter
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
or you do not have permission.Did you run the sql script that came with the download?
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||The fact that you get an error about 'object_schema_name' suggests SP2 is
not installed on the instance since this is a new function added by SP2. Try
(re)applying SP2 to the instance to see if that resolves the issue.
--
HTH,
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/sqldbatips
"Peter Nolan" <peter@.peternolan.com> wrote in message
news:1177505070.696147.173040@.n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> Thanks
> Peter
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not exist
> or you do not have permission.
>|||> GUEST wrote
> Hi All
> I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 o
> windows 2003 and received the following error messages
>
> Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new..
>
> Thank
>
> Pete
>
>
> Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 2
> 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name
> Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure usp_GetPageDetails, Line 4
> Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'
> Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line
> Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does no
exis
> or you do not have permission
I am getting the same error
What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2|||On May 22, 6:54 pm, stacey.do...@.shawinc-dot-com.no-spam.invalid
(sdoran) wrote:
> > GUEST wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I tried to install the new performance dashboards on 2005 sp2 on
> > windows 2003 and received the following error messages.
> >
> > Has anyone seen these before? I know it is quite new...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedureusp_GetPageDetails, Line 27
> > 'object_schema_name' is not a recognized built-in function name.
> > Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedureusp_GetPageDetails, Line 42
> > Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'as'.
> > Msg 15151, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
> > Cannot find the object 'usp_GetPageDetails', because it does not
> exist
> > or you do not have permission.
> I am getting the same error.
> What is the fix for this if the server is on sp2?
Same error here - SQL 2005 SP2 Latest hotfixes, etc. Any fix for
this?
Installing named instance with sample.msi
I need to install a named instance of the Desktop Engine, so I followed the directions at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_74qd.asp
which has instructions on using Orca to modify sample.msi. I also followed the instructions found at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_8yeq.asp
on how to edit the msi file to create a named instance.
YET, when used, this altered msi installs a DEFAULT instance.
Am I missing something? If so, what?
Thanks for any help,
Allan Sorenson
Crossroads technologyOriginally posted by B1ueboy
I need to install a named instance of the Desktop Engine, so I followed the directions at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_74qd.asp
which has instructions on using Orca to modify sample.msi. I also followed the instructions found at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_8yeq.asp
on how to edit the msi file to create a named instance.
YET, when used, this altered msi installs a DEFAULT instance.
Am I missing something? If so, what?
Thanks for any help,
Allan Sorenson
Crossroads technology
A little more info on the last edit:
Using Orca I added the row named 'SqlInstanceName' with the desired instance name as the value to the 'Property' table.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_74qd.asp
which has instructions on using Orca to modify sample.msi. I also followed the instructions found at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_8yeq.asp
on how to edit the msi file to create a named instance.
YET, when used, this altered msi installs a DEFAULT instance.
Am I missing something? If so, what?
Thanks for any help,
Allan Sorenson
Crossroads technologyOriginally posted by B1ueboy
I need to install a named instance of the Desktop Engine, so I followed the directions at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_74qd.asp
which has instructions on using Orca to modify sample.msi. I also followed the instructions found at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/distsql/distsql_8yeq.asp
on how to edit the msi file to create a named instance.
YET, when used, this altered msi installs a DEFAULT instance.
Am I missing something? If so, what?
Thanks for any help,
Allan Sorenson
Crossroads technology
A little more info on the last edit:
Using Orca I added the row named 'SqlInstanceName' with the desired instance name as the value to the 'Property' table.
Installing My Reports
Hello All,
I have designed some Reports in RS, now i want to install it on
Production Machine (Web Server) but issue is that, production machine
doesnt have RS. Can it be possible to make any setup or package which
install required dll's to production machine without installing RS?
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards
RajeshRS is required if you wish to use RS to retrieve your report data as well as
provide report management capabilities. If you just want to display a
report on your web page you should look into using the new Report Viewer
controls that shipped with VS2005.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Raj" <kapse_rajesh@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134627577.603210.61580@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hello All,
> I have designed some Reports in RS, now i want to install it on
> Production Machine (Web Server) but issue is that, production machine
> doesnt have RS. Can it be possible to make any setup or package which
> install required dll's to production machine without installing RS?
> Please help me how to solve this.
>
> Regards
> Rajesh
>|||Daniel,
Thanks for Instant FeedBack, but problem is that I dont have VS2005 and
i just want to display reports on web page, can it be possible that i
use RS's dll or supporting files and install it on Production Machine
and run the reports?|||No, it is not possible. You need to install RS if you want to process the
reports. The only other option you have is the one I mentioned, using the
VS controls in 2005.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Raj" <kapse_rajesh@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134714178.861590.319450@.f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Daniel,
> Thanks for Instant FeedBack, but problem is that I dont have VS2005 and
> i just want to display reports on web page, can it be possible that i
> use RS's dll or supporting files and install it on Production Machine
> and run the reports?
>
I have designed some Reports in RS, now i want to install it on
Production Machine (Web Server) but issue is that, production machine
doesnt have RS. Can it be possible to make any setup or package which
install required dll's to production machine without installing RS?
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards
RajeshRS is required if you wish to use RS to retrieve your report data as well as
provide report management capabilities. If you just want to display a
report on your web page you should look into using the new Report Viewer
controls that shipped with VS2005.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Raj" <kapse_rajesh@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134627577.603210.61580@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hello All,
> I have designed some Reports in RS, now i want to install it on
> Production Machine (Web Server) but issue is that, production machine
> doesnt have RS. Can it be possible to make any setup or package which
> install required dll's to production machine without installing RS?
> Please help me how to solve this.
>
> Regards
> Rajesh
>|||Daniel,
Thanks for Instant FeedBack, but problem is that I dont have VS2005 and
i just want to display reports on web page, can it be possible that i
use RS's dll or supporting files and install it on Production Machine
and run the reports?|||No, it is not possible. You need to install RS if you want to process the
reports. The only other option you have is the one I mentioned, using the
VS controls in 2005.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Raj" <kapse_rajesh@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134714178.861590.319450@.f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Daniel,
> Thanks for Instant FeedBack, but problem is that I dont have VS2005 and
> i just want to display reports on web page, can it be possible that i
> use RS's dll or supporting files and install it on Production Machine
> and run the reports?
>
Installing multiple instances of MSDE2000
Hello
I installed 2 instances of msde , installation passed ok but noone can
connect to my machine , i portscanned host machine and port 1443 is not
opened ,can it be becaus i installed it on a VmWare console, any help is
apriciated.
PS I didn't forget to set DISABLENETWORKPROTOCOLS=0.
Thx in advance
__________
TomislavFist you need to find out what the instance names are and whether one is a
default instance (both are probably named instances as no-one is listening
to port 1433).
Use either server network utility, svrnetcn.exe, or check the services in
the machine. After you know the instance names, you connect using:
machinename\instancename
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
"Tomislav Zemljak" <tomislav.zemljak@.*maknime*bj.tel.hr> wrote in message
news:c3rn9s$ksm$1@.sunce.iskon.hr...
> Hello
> I installed 2 instances of msde , installation passed ok but noone can
> connect to my machine , i portscanned host machine and port 1443 is not
> opened ,can it be becaus i installed it on a VmWare console, any help is
> apriciated.
> PS I didn't forget to set DISABLENETWORKPROTOCOLS=0.
> Thx in advance
> __________
> Tomislav
>|||"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
> Fist you need to find out what the instance names are and whether one is a
> default instance (both are probably named instances as no-one is listening
> to port 1433).
One is default instance , other is named "second"
> Use either server network utility, svrnetcn.exe, or check the services in
> the machine. After you know the instance names, you connect using:
> machinename\instancename
That didn't solve it ... both instances are started and appear to be
working on host machine , remote users still cant connect and portscann
shows that port 1443 isn't open .Thx for trying thou.|||You don't say whether these instances are both named or one is a default def
ault instance. You cannot have two
default instances. My guess is that you have two names instance. A named ins
tance does NOT listen on 1433.
Please follow my direction closely to find out whether these are default or
named instances and the name of
the instance.
This is what I write in my earlier post:
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
"Tomislav Zemljak" <tomislav.zemljak@.*maknime*bj.tel.hr> wrote in message news:c3s99i$4ge$1
@.sunce.iskon.hr...
> "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
> One is default instance , other is named "second"
> That didn't solve it ... both instances are started and appear to be
> working on host machine , remote users still cant connect and portscann
> shows that port 1443 isn't open .Thx for trying thou.
>|||"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
> You don't say whether these instances are both named or one is a default
default instance.
As i already wrote (look below) one is default instance , other is named
"second".
I "fixed" the problem by reinstalling both instances , now they work , thx
for tryng to help !
You cannot have two
> default instances. My guess is that you have two names instance. A named
instance does NOT listen on 1433.
> Please follow my direction closely to find out whether these are default
or named instances and the name of
> the instance.
> This is what I write in my earlier post:
>
in
>
> --
> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
>
> "Tomislav Zemljak" <tomislav.zemljak@.*maknime*bj.tel.hr> wrote in message
news:c3s99i$4ge$1@.sunce.iskon.hr...
wrote:
is a
listening
in
>
I installed 2 instances of msde , installation passed ok but noone can
connect to my machine , i portscanned host machine and port 1443 is not
opened ,can it be becaus i installed it on a VmWare console, any help is
apriciated.
PS I didn't forget to set DISABLENETWORKPROTOCOLS=0.
Thx in advance
__________
TomislavFist you need to find out what the instance names are and whether one is a
default instance (both are probably named instances as no-one is listening
to port 1433).
Use either server network utility, svrnetcn.exe, or check the services in
the machine. After you know the instance names, you connect using:
machinename\instancename
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
"Tomislav Zemljak" <tomislav.zemljak@.*maknime*bj.tel.hr> wrote in message
news:c3rn9s$ksm$1@.sunce.iskon.hr...
> Hello
> I installed 2 instances of msde , installation passed ok but noone can
> connect to my machine , i portscanned host machine and port 1443 is not
> opened ,can it be becaus i installed it on a VmWare console, any help is
> apriciated.
> PS I didn't forget to set DISABLENETWORKPROTOCOLS=0.
> Thx in advance
> __________
> Tomislav
>|||"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
> Fist you need to find out what the instance names are and whether one is a
> default instance (both are probably named instances as no-one is listening
> to port 1433).
One is default instance , other is named "second"
> Use either server network utility, svrnetcn.exe, or check the services in
> the machine. After you know the instance names, you connect using:
> machinename\instancename
That didn't solve it ... both instances are started and appear to be
working on host machine , remote users still cant connect and portscann
shows that port 1443 isn't open .Thx for trying thou.|||You don't say whether these instances are both named or one is a default def
ault instance. You cannot have two
default instances. My guess is that you have two names instance. A named ins
tance does NOT listen on 1433.
Please follow my direction closely to find out whether these are default or
named instances and the name of
the instance.
This is what I write in my earlier post:
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
"Tomislav Zemljak" <tomislav.zemljak@.*maknime*bj.tel.hr> wrote in message news:c3s99i$4ge$1
@.sunce.iskon.hr...
> "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
> One is default instance , other is named "second"
> That didn't solve it ... both instances are started and appear to be
> working on host machine , remote users still cant connect and portscann
> shows that port 1443 isn't open .Thx for trying thou.
>|||"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor_please.no.email_karaszi@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
> You don't say whether these instances are both named or one is a default
default instance.
As i already wrote (look below) one is default instance , other is named
"second".
I "fixed" the problem by reinstalling both instances , now they work , thx
for tryng to help !
You cannot have two
> default instances. My guess is that you have two names instance. A named
instance does NOT listen on 1433.
> Please follow my direction closely to find out whether these are default
or named instances and the name of
> the instance.
> This is what I write in my earlier post:
>
in
>
> --
> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
>
> "Tomislav Zemljak" <tomislav.zemljak@.*maknime*bj.tel.hr> wrote in message
news:c3s99i$4ge$1@.sunce.iskon.hr...
wrote:
is a
listening
in
>
Installing Multiple Instances of ASP.NET Application Services on ONE SQL Server Database
Hi,
I am trying to install multiple application services on 1 sql server database. Is this possible? I do not know how to install anything but the default application services settings for the membership, roles, etc.
Please help if you can.
Thanks,
Ezeibe
Seems not possilble in 1 databases, but should be able in different databases on 1 SQL instance. Just use aspnet_regsql.exe to create schema for membership in serveral database, and then connect to 1 database respectively in your applications.Installing Multiple Instances Design Question
I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
single machine.
The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
moderate growth.
The box will be configured with a raid 5.
Question:
Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Hulicat
I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
(Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
Drives.
Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
That would be painful.
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
>I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> single machine.
> The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> moderate growth.
> The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> Question:
> Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Hulicat
>
|||~Thanks~
Arnie Rowland wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
> (Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
> If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
> Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
> being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
> Drives.
> Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
> files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
> performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
> I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
> That would be painful.
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
> You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
> top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
> "Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
single machine.
The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
moderate growth.
The box will be configured with a raid 5.
Question:
Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Hulicat
I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
(Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
Drives.
Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
That would be painful.
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
>I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> single machine.
> The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> moderate growth.
> The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> Question:
> Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Hulicat
>
|||~Thanks~
Arnie Rowland wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
> (Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
> If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
> Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
> being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
> Drives.
> Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
> files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
> performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
> I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
> That would be painful.
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
> You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
> top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
> "Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
Installing Multiple Instances Design Question
I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
single machine.
The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
moderate growth.
The box will be configured with a raid 5.
Question:
Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
HulicatI would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
(Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
Drives.
Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
That would be painful.
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> single machine.
> The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> moderate growth.
> The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> Question:
> Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Hulicat
>|||~Thanks~
Arnie Rowland wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
> (Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
> If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
> Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
> being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
> Drives.
> Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for da
ta
> files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
> performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
> I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
> That would be painful.
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
> You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to th
e
> top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
> "Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...sql
single machine.
The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
moderate growth.
The box will be configured with a raid 5.
Question:
Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
HulicatI would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
(Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
Drives.
Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
That would be painful.
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> single machine.
> The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> moderate growth.
> The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> Question:
> Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Hulicat
>|||~Thanks~
Arnie Rowland wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
> (Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
> If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
> Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
> being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
> Drives.
> Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for da
ta
> files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
> performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
> I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
> That would be painful.
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
> You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to th
e
> top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
> "Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...sql
Installing Multiple Instances Design Question
I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
single machine.
The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
moderate growth.
The box will be configured with a raid 5.
Question:
Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
HulicatI would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
(Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
Drives.
Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
That would be painful.
--
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> single machine.
> The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> moderate growth.
> The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> Question:
> Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Hulicat
>|||~Thanks~
Arnie Rowland wrote:
> I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
> (Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
> If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
> Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
> being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
> Drives.
> Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
> files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
> performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
> I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
> That would be painful.
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
> You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
> top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
> "Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> > single machine.
> > The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> > moderate growth.
> >
> > The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> >
> > Question:
> > Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> > Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> > dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> >
> > Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hulicat
> >
single machine.
The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
moderate growth.
The box will be configured with a raid 5.
Question:
Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
HulicatI would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
(Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
Drives.
Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
That would be painful.
--
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> single machine.
> The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> moderate growth.
> The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> Question:
> Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Hulicat
>|||~Thanks~
Arnie Rowland wrote:
> I would investigate if the four database could reside in the same server.
> (Perhaps because of security or other needs, that is not possible.)
> If you have to have 'separate' servers, install multiple instances of SQL
> Server on the same box. All instances will use the same OS -the only thing
> being 'duplicated' is SQL Server instances (code, settings, etc.)
> Drives.
> Best choice: RAID 1 for OS and SQL installables (2 drives). RAID 10 for data
> files (4 drives). RAID 10 for Logs files (4 drives). For optimal
> performance, each instance 'should' have its own drives for data and logs.
> I wouldn't recommend trying to make everything work with a single RAID 5.
> That would be painful.
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
> You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
> top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
> "Hulicat" <dennis_A_white@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1162403869.339729.318940@.e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >I have 4 small small SQL 2000 databases that I need to consolidate to a
> > single machine.
> > The data is minimal maybe 100 GB total with an expection of some
> > moderate growth.
> >
> > The box will be configured with a raid 5.
> >
> > Question:
> > Should the O.S and each instance be on its own partition?
> > Or would it be better to have the instances on one partition and
> > dedicate a partition for the data and log files?
> >
> > Any inforomation would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hulicat
> >
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents
hi,
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
running it on XP SP2.
anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
any help would be appreciated.
Doron, shalom
I have just installed SP2 on XP SP2 and it worked just fine. What is the
path of your SQL Server instalaltion?
<doron.almog@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172531419.194567.175800@.h3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
> hi,
> Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
> running it on XP SP2.
> anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
> any help would be appreciated.
>
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
running it on XP SP2.
anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
any help would be appreciated.
Doron, shalom
I have just installed SP2 on XP SP2 and it worked just fine. What is the
path of your SQL Server instalaltion?
<doron.almog@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172531419.194567.175800@.h3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
> hi,
> Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
> running it on XP SP2.
> anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
> any help would be appreciated.
>
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents
hi,
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
running it on XP SP2.
anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
any help would be appreciated.Doron, shalom
I have just installed SP2 on XP SP2 and it worked just fine. What is the
path of your SQL Server instalaltion?
<doron.almog@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172531419.194567.175800@.h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> hi,
> Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
> running it on XP SP2.
> anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
> any help would be appreciated.
>
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
running it on XP SP2.
anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
any help would be appreciated.Doron, shalom
I have just installed SP2 on XP SP2 and it worked just fine. What is the
path of your SQL Server instalaltion?
<doron.almog@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172531419.194567.175800@.h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> hi,
> Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
> running it on XP SP2.
> anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
> any help would be appreciated.
>
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents
hi,
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
running it on XP SP2.
anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
any help would be appreciated.Doron, shalom
I have just installed SP2 on XP SP2 and it worked just fine. What is the
path of your SQL Server instalaltion?
<doron.almog@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172531419.194567.175800@.h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> hi,
> Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
> running it on XP SP2.
> anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
> any help would be appreciated.
>
Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
running it on XP SP2.
anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
any help would be appreciated.Doron, shalom
I have just installed SP2 on XP SP2 and it worked just fine. What is the
path of your SQL Server instalaltion?
<doron.almog@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172531419.194567.175800@.h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> hi,
> Installing MSSQL 2005 SP2 deleted all documents in my documents. i'm
> running it on XP SP2.
> anybody run into this? restoring OS does not bring back the files.
> any help would be appreciated.
>
Installing MSDTC Resource after installing SQL Server 2000 cluster
Is it possible to install and configure the MSDTC resource in a SQL Server 2000 cluster after SQL is installed and running?
When I recently went through a rebuild of my cluster, I forgot to install the resource before installing SQL Server. Now, if I install and bring online the MSDTC resource the SQL disk groups will not fail over correctly. The SQL Server resource will not come online.
Thanks in advance for any help. I would really like to avoid rebuilding again.
Andy
I am not an expert on clusters but you might want to check out the following article
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/294209/en-us
Michelle
Installing MSDE200A on Windows 2003
I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
install MSDE RelA.
I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
MSDE it claims there is no database.
I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
Hi
In Control Panel > Services, Is the MSDE service there and running?
Regards
Mike
"Brian" wrote:
> I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
> install MSDE RelA.
> I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
> successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
> MSDE it claims there is no database.
> I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
> uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
|||I do "Net Start" and MSSQLSERVER is listed. It is also displayed in the gui
as automatic and running.
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi
> In Control Panel > Services, Is the MSDE service there and running?
> Regards
> Mike
> "Brian" wrote:
|||MSDE installs by default with Windows Security only. Setting an sa password
doesn't influence that. You also have to add SECURITYMODE=SQL to your setup
script if you want to use SQL Security.
You can change an MSDE installation to use SQL Security after it has been
installed by changing the registry key
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSSQLServer\MSSQLServer\Lo ginMode to 2.
See:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;285097
for extensive info.
Jacco Schalkwijk
SQL Server MVP
"Brian" <Brian@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B17BA79-2F77-47D2-AAB1-99C3495885EC@.microsoft.com...
>I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
> install MSDE RelA.
> I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
> successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
> MSDE it claims there is no database.
> I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
> uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
|||Brian,
By default MSDE RelA installs with TCP protocol turned off for security
reasons. Use svrnetcn.exe in the Binn folder to enable protocols and
configure ports.
Ron Allen
"Brian" <Brian@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B17BA79-2F77-47D2-AAB1-99C3495885EC@.microsoft.com...
>I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
> install MSDE RelA.
> I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
> successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
> MSDE it claims there is no database.
> I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
> uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
install MSDE RelA.
I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
MSDE it claims there is no database.
I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
Hi
In Control Panel > Services, Is the MSDE service there and running?
Regards
Mike
"Brian" wrote:
> I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
> install MSDE RelA.
> I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
> successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
> MSDE it claims there is no database.
> I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
> uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
|||I do "Net Start" and MSSQLSERVER is listed. It is also displayed in the gui
as automatic and running.
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi
> In Control Panel > Services, Is the MSDE service there and running?
> Regards
> Mike
> "Brian" wrote:
|||MSDE installs by default with Windows Security only. Setting an sa password
doesn't influence that. You also have to add SECURITYMODE=SQL to your setup
script if you want to use SQL Security.
You can change an MSDE installation to use SQL Security after it has been
installed by changing the registry key
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSSQLServer\MSSQLServer\Lo ginMode to 2.
See:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;285097
for extensive info.
Jacco Schalkwijk
SQL Server MVP
"Brian" <Brian@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B17BA79-2F77-47D2-AAB1-99C3495885EC@.microsoft.com...
>I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
> install MSDE RelA.
> I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
> successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
> MSDE it claims there is no database.
> I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
> uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
|||Brian,
By default MSDE RelA installs with TCP protocol turned off for security
reasons. Use svrnetcn.exe in the Binn folder to enable protocols and
configure ports.
Ron Allen
"Brian" <Brian@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B17BA79-2F77-47D2-AAB1-99C3495885EC@.microsoft.com...
>I have done a freresh install of Windows 2003, patches and now trying to
> install MSDE RelA.
> I use the command line "SETUP SAPWD="Password"" and it appears to install
> successfully. I restart. When I try to install an application that uses
> MSDE it claims there is no database.
> I do a "netstat -an" and do not see anything listening on port 1433. I've
> uninstalled and reinstalled with no change. What am I doing wrong?
Installing MSDE2000 sp3 - help
Hiya folks,
I'm a newbie at this, so forgive the ignorance that I may display!
I have installed a software package on my system that installs MSDE through
merge modules contained in its MSI. I have several workstations that
connect. Unfortunately, with SP2 coming down the pipe for windows xp, i
have to do lots of fancy stuff to make sure they still connect (it uses
named pipes tcp/ip). The solution according to microsoft is to install SP3
for sql...i've downloaded the MSDE version of the upgrade, and attempted to
install for several hours with no luck.
First, it said i required a strong password, which i supplised in the
setup.ini:
[options]
sapassword="mypassword"
Things started to load, and then the installer quit. Confused, I started it
again. Now the installer is giving me '
the instance name specified is invalid'
Ok, so i go back to the setup.ini and add a line
[options]
sapassword="mypassword"
instancename="liveddm"
and STILL, i get the invalid instance name error message. No matter what I
seem to try, it is telling me i have an invalid instance name; if i use
enterprise manager, i can clearly see my instance and browse the attached
database. I've also tried instancename="computername\liveddm" with no luck.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sheldon
sheldon@.REMOVETHISthedoctorcompany.com
Sheldon Purkiss wrote:
> Hiya folks,
> I'm a newbie at this, so forgive the ignorance that I may display!
> I have installed a software package on my system that installs MSDE through
> merge modules contained in its MSI. I have several workstations that
> connect. Unfortunately, with SP2 coming down the pipe for windows xp, i
> have to do lots of fancy stuff to make sure they still connect (it uses
> named pipes tcp/ip). The solution according to microsoft is to install SP3
> for sql...i've downloaded the MSDE version of the upgrade, and attempted to
> install for several hours with no luck.
> First, it said i required a strong password, which i supplised in the
> setup.ini:
> [options]
> sapassword="mypassword"
> Things started to load, and then the installer quit. Confused, I started it
> again. Now the installer is giving me '
> the instance name specified is invalid'
> Ok, so i go back to the setup.ini and add a line
> [options]
> sapassword="mypassword"
> instancename="liveddm"
> and STILL, i get the invalid instance name error message. No matter what I
> seem to try, it is telling me i have an invalid instance name; if i use
> enterprise manager, i can clearly see my instance and browse the attached
> database. I've also tried instancename="computername\liveddm" with no luck.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks!
> Sheldon
> sheldon@.REMOVETHISthedoctorcompany.com
>
>
>
Hi Sheldon
Unfortunately, I believe that if your software vendor has installed MSDE
using merge modules from within their own MSI they will need to supply
you with the patch package themselves.
See http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp3.asp
Tony
I'm a newbie at this, so forgive the ignorance that I may display!
I have installed a software package on my system that installs MSDE through
merge modules contained in its MSI. I have several workstations that
connect. Unfortunately, with SP2 coming down the pipe for windows xp, i
have to do lots of fancy stuff to make sure they still connect (it uses
named pipes tcp/ip). The solution according to microsoft is to install SP3
for sql...i've downloaded the MSDE version of the upgrade, and attempted to
install for several hours with no luck.
First, it said i required a strong password, which i supplised in the
setup.ini:
[options]
sapassword="mypassword"
Things started to load, and then the installer quit. Confused, I started it
again. Now the installer is giving me '
the instance name specified is invalid'
Ok, so i go back to the setup.ini and add a line
[options]
sapassword="mypassword"
instancename="liveddm"
and STILL, i get the invalid instance name error message. No matter what I
seem to try, it is telling me i have an invalid instance name; if i use
enterprise manager, i can clearly see my instance and browse the attached
database. I've also tried instancename="computername\liveddm" with no luck.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sheldon
sheldon@.REMOVETHISthedoctorcompany.com
Sheldon Purkiss wrote:
> Hiya folks,
> I'm a newbie at this, so forgive the ignorance that I may display!
> I have installed a software package on my system that installs MSDE through
> merge modules contained in its MSI. I have several workstations that
> connect. Unfortunately, with SP2 coming down the pipe for windows xp, i
> have to do lots of fancy stuff to make sure they still connect (it uses
> named pipes tcp/ip). The solution according to microsoft is to install SP3
> for sql...i've downloaded the MSDE version of the upgrade, and attempted to
> install for several hours with no luck.
> First, it said i required a strong password, which i supplised in the
> setup.ini:
> [options]
> sapassword="mypassword"
> Things started to load, and then the installer quit. Confused, I started it
> again. Now the installer is giving me '
> the instance name specified is invalid'
> Ok, so i go back to the setup.ini and add a line
> [options]
> sapassword="mypassword"
> instancename="liveddm"
> and STILL, i get the invalid instance name error message. No matter what I
> seem to try, it is telling me i have an invalid instance name; if i use
> enterprise manager, i can clearly see my instance and browse the attached
> database. I've also tried instancename="computername\liveddm" with no luck.
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks!
> Sheldon
> sheldon@.REMOVETHISthedoctorcompany.com
>
>
>
Hi Sheldon
Unfortunately, I believe that if your software vendor has installed MSDE
using merge modules from within their own MSI they will need to supply
you with the patch package themselves.
See http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp3.asp
Tony
Installing MSDE2000
Hi,
I've been trying to follow Microsoft's instructions on installing MSDE2000 for Visual Studio. I do instancename=VSDOTNET SECURITY=SQL SAPWD=XXXX and all that. When I reboot, I notice that I have no services in the SQL Service Manager, nor can it find my computername.
I've been trying to follow Microsoft's instructions on installing MSDE2000 for Visual Studio. I do instancename=VSDOTNET SECURITY=SQL SAPWD=XXXX and all that. When I reboot, I notice that I have no services in the SQL Service Manager, nor can it find my computername.
Anybody know why this is?This is on Windows XP professional SP1.
Installing MSDE??
Ok I installed the MSDE and after following the steps the last message box says to go to the control panel and install and configure the components.
I'm not sure what to do once I'm in the control panel.
Thank you.Somewhere along the way did you try to install MSDE but were unsuccessful? What is the exact wording of the message you are receiving?
Terri|||I am also having a problem with the installation of MSDE. About 2/3's the way through the installation the process froze. I cannot uninstall or re-install. The message I am receiving is that the installation was tampered with and needs to be uninstalled and re-installed. When I go to My Computer, Install/Uninstall Software, SQL Server is not listed.
Any suggestions?|||Well, searching the SQL Server and MSDE Forum here for posts from others who have experienced the same thing is a good start. And then starting a new thread with your own particular situation with the exact error messages would be the next step.
Terri|||i have the same probleme.
in my case it was an error of directory\subdirectory
c:\sql2ksp3\MSDE>
don't forget the MSDE subdirectory !! ;)
then type the command : setup SAPWD=xxxx SecurityMode=SQL
i hope it can help you.sql
installing MSDE?
Hello!
In the setup of MSDE I need to edit the ini file. Well when I do it looks as if the installation was complete, but there is no MSDE services application and the actual services are on the box(I can start/stop them). Could someone show me what the edited ini file needs to have to be sure the install is complete? Or maybe there's something else that I need to do and just don't know about.
Many thanks.Not sure I understand what the problem is.
Is it MSDE 1.0 or MSDE 2000?
Is the OS NT or Win2k or 9x/ME?
Can you see if the MSSQLSERVER service is running?
You can check this easily by running sqlmangr.exe
In the setup of MSDE I need to edit the ini file. Well when I do it looks as if the installation was complete, but there is no MSDE services application and the actual services are on the box(I can start/stop them). Could someone show me what the edited ini file needs to have to be sure the install is complete? Or maybe there's something else that I need to do and just don't know about.
Many thanks.Not sure I understand what the problem is.
Is it MSDE 1.0 or MSDE 2000?
Is the OS NT or Win2k or 9x/ME?
Can you see if the MSSQLSERVER service is running?
You can check this easily by running sqlmangr.exe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)