Hello All,
I have designed some Reports in RS, now i want to install it on
Production Machine (Web Server) but issue is that, production machine
doesnt have RS. Can it be possible to make any setup or package which
install required dll's to production machine without installing RS?
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards
RajeshRS is required if you wish to use RS to retrieve your report data as well as
provide report management capabilities. If you just want to display a
report on your web page you should look into using the new Report Viewer
controls that shipped with VS2005.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Raj" <kapse_rajesh@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134627577.603210.61580@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hello All,
> I have designed some Reports in RS, now i want to install it on
> Production Machine (Web Server) but issue is that, production machine
> doesnt have RS. Can it be possible to make any setup or package which
> install required dll's to production machine without installing RS?
> Please help me how to solve this.
>
> Regards
> Rajesh
>|||Daniel,
Thanks for Instant FeedBack, but problem is that I dont have VS2005 and
i just want to display reports on web page, can it be possible that i
use RS's dll or supporting files and install it on Production Machine
and run the reports?|||No, it is not possible. You need to install RS if you want to process the
reports. The only other option you have is the one I mentioned, using the
VS controls in 2005.
--
-Daniel
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Raj" <kapse_rajesh@.rediffmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134714178.861590.319450@.f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Daniel,
> Thanks for Instant FeedBack, but problem is that I dont have VS2005 and
> i just want to display reports on web page, can it be possible that i
> use RS's dll or supporting files and install it on Production Machine
> and run the reports?
>
Showing posts with label production. Show all posts
Showing posts with label production. Show all posts
Friday, March 30, 2012
Installing My Reports
Friday, March 23, 2012
Installing A Default Instance AFTER a Named Instance??
I have SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition (sp3a) running on a windows 2003 (sp4) Server.
It is a Production Server with 3 NAMED Instances and NO Default Instance.
Does anyone know if I can rerun the SQL Server Install and add a DEFAULT Instance to this box without disrupting the other Named Instances?Except for a reboot after the install, you should have no problems installing a default instance.|||Thank you : )|||Will the default instance automatically have the name of the Server - or is there a way to give it name - like you would a named instance.. sorry if the question sounds stupid.. : )|||The default instance will have the name of the server. The only way around this that I can think of off the top of my head is to give the machine a DNS alias.|||Thanks !!! I'm not so much worried about the name as I am Blowing up the Server by installing a Default Instance AFTER it has already been populated with Named Instances.
It is a Production Server with 3 NAMED Instances and NO Default Instance.
Does anyone know if I can rerun the SQL Server Install and add a DEFAULT Instance to this box without disrupting the other Named Instances?Except for a reboot after the install, you should have no problems installing a default instance.|||Thank you : )|||Will the default instance automatically have the name of the Server - or is there a way to give it name - like you would a named instance.. sorry if the question sounds stupid.. : )|||The default instance will have the name of the server. The only way around this that I can think of off the top of my head is to give the machine a DNS alias.|||Thanks !!! I'm not so much worried about the name as I am Blowing up the Server by installing a Default Instance AFTER it has already been populated with Named Instances.
Monday, March 19, 2012
installation trouble
ok i am working on Win2k pro.
i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the production
server.
I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled on
Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS Std
to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
So I had to download the trial.
And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks like
the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with about
80% of the functionality that I remembered.
I am a local admin.
I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to make 2
sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to view
reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
-aaronReportServer is the home for Web Service. You should just get a simple page
if you go there.. if your getting an error, details would be appreciated.
/Reports or /ReportManager whatever you called it is the UI for the Web
Service.
thats what your users should use.
<aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OCnZeBW3EHA.2600@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> ok i am working on Win2k pro.
> i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the production
> server.
> I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled on
> Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
> The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS Std
> to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
> So I had to download the trial.
> And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks
> like
> the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with
> about
> 80% of the functionality that I remembered.
> I am a local admin.
> I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to make
> 2
> sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
> I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
> ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
> People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to view
> reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
> http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
> -aaron
>
>|||thank you.
I am getting a directory listing when i browse the ReportServer site; do i
need to at least drop that perms?
I'm a local admin
"CJ Taylor" <jjackson@.jackson5.com> wrote in message
news:e7ySAIW3EHA.1400@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> ReportServer is the home for Web Service. You should just get a simple
page
> if you go there.. if your getting an error, details would be appreciated.
> /Reports or /ReportManager whatever you called it is the UI for the Web
> Service.
> thats what your users should use.
> <aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OCnZeBW3EHA.2600@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > ok i am working on Win2k pro.
> >
> > i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the
production
> > server.
> >
> > I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled on
> > Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
> >
> > The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS
Std
> > to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
> >
> > So I had to download the trial.
> >
> > And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks
> > like
> > the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with
> > about
> > 80% of the functionality that I remembered.
> >
> > I am a local admin.
> >
> > I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to
make
> > 2
> > sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
> >
> > I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
> > ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
> >
> > People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to view
> > reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
> > http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
> >
> > -aaron
> >
> >
> >
>|||If you check the URL of an actual report inside ReportManager, you'll see
that it's actually calling a ReportServer URL, so you shouldn't change
permissions on ReportServer. Whatever permissions you set via ReportManager
will be reflected in the ReportServer. ReportManager is simply a friendly
interface to the same thing, with some admin tools on top if it for
administrators.
--
Cheers,
'(' Jeff A. Stucker
\
Business Intelligence
www.criadvantage.com
---
<aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%238D%23zTW3EHA.2572@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> thank you.
> I am getting a directory listing when i browse the ReportServer site; do i
> need to at least drop that perms?
> I'm a local admin
>
>
> "CJ Taylor" <jjackson@.jackson5.com> wrote in message
> news:e7ySAIW3EHA.1400@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> ReportServer is the home for Web Service. You should just get a simple
> page
>> if you go there.. if your getting an error, details would be
>> appreciated.
>> /Reports or /ReportManager whatever you called it is the UI for the Web
>> Service.
>> thats what your users should use.
>> <aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:OCnZeBW3EHA.2600@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> > ok i am working on Win2k pro.
>> >
>> > i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the
> production
>> > server.
>> >
>> > I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled
>> > on
>> > Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
>> >
>> > The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS
> Std
>> > to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
>> >
>> > So I had to download the trial.
>> >
>> > And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks
>> > like
>> > the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with
>> > about
>> > 80% of the functionality that I remembered.
>> >
>> > I am a local admin.
>> >
>> > I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to
> make
>> > 2
>> > sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
>> >
>> > I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
>> > ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
>> >
>> > People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to
>> > view
>> > reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
>> > http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
>> >
>> > -aaron
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the production
server.
I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled on
Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS Std
to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
So I had to download the trial.
And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks like
the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with about
80% of the functionality that I remembered.
I am a local admin.
I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to make 2
sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to view
reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
-aaronReportServer is the home for Web Service. You should just get a simple page
if you go there.. if your getting an error, details would be appreciated.
/Reports or /ReportManager whatever you called it is the UI for the Web
Service.
thats what your users should use.
<aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OCnZeBW3EHA.2600@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> ok i am working on Win2k pro.
> i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the production
> server.
> I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled on
> Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
> The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS Std
> to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
> So I had to download the trial.
> And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks
> like
> the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with
> about
> 80% of the functionality that I remembered.
> I am a local admin.
> I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to make
> 2
> sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
> I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
> ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
> People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to view
> reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
> http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
> -aaron
>
>|||thank you.
I am getting a directory listing when i browse the ReportServer site; do i
need to at least drop that perms?
I'm a local admin
"CJ Taylor" <jjackson@.jackson5.com> wrote in message
news:e7ySAIW3EHA.1400@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> ReportServer is the home for Web Service. You should just get a simple
page
> if you go there.. if your getting an error, details would be appreciated.
> /Reports or /ReportManager whatever you called it is the UI for the Web
> Service.
> thats what your users should use.
> <aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OCnZeBW3EHA.2600@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > ok i am working on Win2k pro.
> >
> > i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the
production
> > server.
> >
> > I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled on
> > Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
> >
> > The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS
Std
> > to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
> >
> > So I had to download the trial.
> >
> > And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks
> > like
> > the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with
> > about
> > 80% of the functionality that I remembered.
> >
> > I am a local admin.
> >
> > I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to
make
> > 2
> > sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
> >
> > I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
> > ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
> >
> > People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to view
> > reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
> > http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
> >
> > -aaron
> >
> >
> >
>|||If you check the URL of an actual report inside ReportManager, you'll see
that it's actually calling a ReportServer URL, so you shouldn't change
permissions on ReportServer. Whatever permissions you set via ReportManager
will be reflected in the ReportServer. ReportManager is simply a friendly
interface to the same thing, with some admin tools on top if it for
administrators.
--
Cheers,
'(' Jeff A. Stucker
\
Business Intelligence
www.criadvantage.com
---
<aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%238D%23zTW3EHA.2572@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> thank you.
> I am getting a directory listing when i browse the ReportServer site; do i
> need to at least drop that perms?
> I'm a local admin
>
>
> "CJ Taylor" <jjackson@.jackson5.com> wrote in message
> news:e7ySAIW3EHA.1400@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> ReportServer is the home for Web Service. You should just get a simple
> page
>> if you go there.. if your getting an error, details would be
>> appreciated.
>> /Reports or /ReportManager whatever you called it is the UI for the Web
>> Service.
>> thats what your users should use.
>> <aaron_kempf@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:OCnZeBW3EHA.2600@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> > ok i am working on Win2k pro.
>> >
>> > i want to be able to develop reports and then move them to the
> production
>> > server.
>> >
>> > I can't use MSDE, or Std Edition on my machine-- so I finally settled
>> > on
>> > Developers' edition of SQL OLTP.
>> >
>> > The CD that I have only had a Std Edition of RS; and I couldn't get RS
> Std
>> > to use SQL Developers' edition for the RS databases.
>> >
>> > So I had to download the trial.
>> >
>> > And now the http://127.0.0./reportServer site is failing; but it looks
>> > like
>> > the http://127.0.0.1/reportManager site is working as expected.. with
>> > about
>> > 80% of the functionality that I remembered.
>> >
>> > I am a local admin.
>> >
>> > I guess that I am a lil bit confused.. When I installed; it wanted to
> make
>> > 2
>> > sites http://127.0.0.1/reports and http://127.0.0.1/reportServer
>> >
>> > I was just confused; the report manager site-- shouldn't that be called
>> > ReportManager? It defaulted to 'Reports' and i changed it-
>> >
>> > People will actually naviagate to the ReportServer site in order to
>> > view
>> > reports' Or does everyone-- from me to an end user; have to go to
>> > http://127.0.0.1/ReportManager site now?
>> >
>> > -aaron
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)